The global sports betting industry has reached a critical inflection point in 2025. While valued at USD 108.92 billion in 2024 and projected to reach USD 198.53 billion by 2030, the sector’s strategic focus has fundamentally shifted from aggressive expansion to sustainable profitability, driven by regulatory sophistication and market consolidation.
Download presentation (.pdf)
Download research (.pdf)
The New Reality of Sports Betting: Profitability Over Growth in a Maturing Market
The era of growth-at-all-costs in sports betting has definitively ended. Market leaders are now intensely focused on achieving positive EBITDA and demonstrating sustainable profitability rather than pursuing customer acquisition at any expense. This transformation reflects both natural market maturation and mounting pressure from governments seeking to maximize tax revenue while protecting consumers.
The United States exemplifies this shift most dramatically. FanDuel and DraftKings have consolidated their dominance, controlling 67% of the combined online sports betting and iGaming market as of July 2024. FanDuel holds approximately 35% market share while DraftKings commands 32%, with both companies successfully transitioning to profitability after years of losses.
FanDuel’s remarkable turnaround from a $1.2 billion loss in 2023 to $162 million profit in 2024 signals that the path to profitability is achievable for market leaders who control sufficient scale and can reduce promotional spending.
Market Size and Growth Trajectory
The global sports betting market demonstrates robust growth fundamentals despite the strategic pivot toward profitability. Valued at USD 108.92 billion in 2024, the market is projected to reach USD 198.53 billion by 2030, representing a compound annual growth rate of approximately 10%.
This expansion is fueled by three primary drivers: regulatory liberalization across multiple jurisdictions, technological advancement in mobile and live betting platforms, and increasing consumer acceptance of legal sports wagering. The structural shift from land-based to online channels continues to accelerate, with online platforms now accounting for approximately 78% of total sports betting revenue in developed markets.
Grand View Research projects that online sports betting will grow at a 12.9% CAGR through 2030, significantly outpacing offline channels as mobile technology and live betting capabilities continue to advance.
The Duopoly Effect: Market Concentration in the United States
The U.S. market provides the clearest example of accelerating consolidation. FanDuel and DraftKings control 67% of the combined online sports betting and iGaming market, built on the foundation of pre-existing Daily Fantasy Sports customer bases. Both companies converted millions of DFS users to sportsbook customers following the 2018 PASPA repeal.
The dominance of these two operators has created formidable barriers to entry for competitors. BetMGM and Caesars Sportsbook, despite substantial brand recognition and existing casino operations, hold only 11% and 6% market share respectively. Media-backed entrants including FOX Bet and SI Sportsbook failed to gain meaningful traction.
| Operator | Market Share | Status |
|---|---|---|
| FanDuel | 35% | Market Leader |
| DraftKings | 32% | Co-Leader |
| BetMGM | 11% | Third Place |
| Caesars | 6% | Fourth Place |
| ESPN Bet | 2-5% | Struggling |
Several structural factors drive this concentration: network effects and customer loyalty from early market entry, economies of scale in technology infrastructure and data analytics, high customer acquisition costs favoring operators with large existing user bases, and significant licensing fees creating barriers to entry.
Tax Policy: The Critical Determinant of Market Viability
Tax policy has emerged as the single most important factor determining operator profitability and market health. The experiences of the Netherlands and New York provide contrasting case studies in the consequences of taxation decisions.
The Netherlands increased its gambling tax from 30.5% to 34.2% on January 1, 2025, with plans to raise it further to 37.8% in 2026. The Ministry of Finance projected this would generate an additional €200 million annually. Instead, gross gaming revenue in the first half of 2025 declined by 25% compared to the same period in 2024.
The Netherlands’ tax increase has created a €200 million revenue shortfall—the exact amount the government hoped to gain. This textbook example of the Laffer curve demonstrates that excessive tax rates shrink the tax base by driving high-value players to untaxed offshore platforms.
New York represents a contrasting scenario where exceptionally high taxation has not destroyed the market, but only because of unique circumstances. The state imposes a 51% tax on gross gaming revenue, the highest rate in the United States. Despite this burden, New York generated over $861 million in tax revenue in 2023 alone.
This success is attributable to New York’s exceptional market characteristics: a population of 19.5 million with high disposable income concentrated in a small geographic area. The economies of scale allow operators to absorb the tax burden while still operating profitably at massive scale. However, operators have responded by implementing surcharges and reducing promotional spending, and the model is not replicable in smaller markets.
Analysis of multiple jurisdictions suggests that GGR tax rates between 15-25% represent a sustainable equilibrium. The UK’s 21% remote gaming duty and Ontario’s 20% tax have both supported thriving markets with high channelization while generating substantial tax revenue.
Regulatory Models: Competition Versus Monopoly
The structure of regulatory frameworks significantly impacts channelization rates—the percentage of gambling activity occurring on licensed platforms. Ontario’s experience provides compelling evidence for the superiority of competitive licensing frameworks.
When Ontario launched its open market in April 2022, it transitioned from a monopoly model operated by Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation to an open-licensing system allowing private operators to compete. As of April 2025, 49 licensed operators offer 84 gaming sites. The results have been dramatic.
Channelization reached 86% by April 2024, representing a substantial increase from the estimated 30% under the previous monopoly model. For fiscal year 2024-25, operators generated CAD $3.2 billion in gross gaming revenue, with the province collecting close to CAD $1.5 billion in tax revenue at the 20% rate.
| Jurisdiction | Model | Channelization Rate | Annual GGR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ontario | Open Licensing (49 operators) | 86% | CAD $3.2 billion |
| Other Canadian Provinces | Crown Monopolies | 11% | Lost CAD $2 billion offshore |
The contrast with Canadian provinces that retained crown monopolies is striking. Provinces outside Ontario have an estimated onshore channelization rate of only 11%, losing approximately CAD $2 billion in taxable gross gaming revenue to offshore sites. The monopoly model fails because government-operated platforms typically offer inferior odds, limited betting options, and poor user experiences compared to international competitors.
Government monopolies cannot match the innovation and value proposition of competitive markets. Without competitive pressure, these platforms consistently underperform in channelization, consumer satisfaction, and ultimately tax revenue generation.
Responsible Gambling: From Optional to Mandatory
Advanced responsible gambling technology is transitioning from optional best practice to mandatory licensing requirement. The UK Gambling Commission has pioneered a new global standard with mandatory financial vulnerability checks.
The implementation has been remarkably successful. A pilot program for high-spending customers achieved a 97% frictionless completion rate across 1.7 million checks, far exceeding the 80% target set in the 2023 Government White Paper. This demonstrates that sophisticated financial risk assessment can be implemented with minimal disruption to the vast majority of consumers while identifying those at highest risk.
The UK’s frictionless financial vulnerability checks set a new global standard. With 97% of checks completed without customer friction across 1.7 million assessments, the system proves that sophisticated player protection can be both effective and minimally disruptive.
Centralized self-exclusion databases have also become a global standard. The UK’s GAMSTOP, Australia’s BetStop, the Netherlands’ CRUKS, Denmark’s ROFUS, Germany’s OASIS, and Sweden’s Spelpaus all require licensed operators to query national databases in real-time during customer registration. Brazil’s 2025 regulatory framework mandates integration with a national self-exclusion system and requires verification against the national taxpayer registry.
Enforcement: The Technical War on Illegal Operators
Regulators have escalated enforcement against illegal operators with increasingly effective technical measures. Brazil has implemented one of the world’s most aggressive campaigns, with the National Telecommunications Agency blocking over 18,000 illegal betting domains since October 2024.
Brazil’s enforcement operates through Anatel issuing orders to over 20,000 internet service providers, blocking illegal domains at the infrastructure level. This enforcement operates under a technical cooperation agreement signed on October 9, 2024, which accelerated the domain takedown process.
Australia’s regulatory approach has also proven effective. The Australian Communications and Media Authority has blocked over 1,300 sites since 2019, with blocking resulting in a 90-100% traffic decrease to blocked domains. More significantly, over 220 illegal gambling services have voluntarily exited the Australian market following ACMA’s blocking requests, demonstrating the deterrent effect of coordinated enforcement.
- DNS and ISP-level blocking reduces traffic to illegal sites by 90-100%, making operations economically unviable for most offshore operators
- App store enforcement through Apple and Google provides effective distribution channel control, as demonstrated by the Netherlands removing 20 illegal gambling apps in early 2025
- Payment blocking disrupts the financial infrastructure supporting illegal operations, cutting off the revenue streams that sustain unlicensed platforms
- Multi-agency coordination between telecommunications regulators, financial authorities, and police increases enforcement effectiveness and closes regulatory gaps
While technical enforcement is increasingly effective, regulators acknowledge limitations. Unlicensed platforms can circumvent blocks by registering new domains or using alternative digital infrastructures, requiring ongoing monitoring and enforcement.
Strategic Implications for Operators
The evolving regulatory landscape creates clear strategic imperatives for operators seeking sustainable growth. Success now requires fundamentally different approaches than the growth-focused strategies of 2018-2022.
Investment in compliance technology must increase dramatically. Responsible gambling systems, particularly frictionless financial vulnerability checks and national self-exclusion database integration, are transitioning from optional to mandatory. Operators must allocate significant capital to API integrations, real-time data processing, and auditable AI systems.
The strategic focus has permanently shifted from customer acquisition at any cost to operational efficiency and regulatory compliance. Achieving significant market share in mature markets now requires exceptional scale, capital, and early entry advantages that are increasingly difficult for new entrants to replicate.
Policy Recommendations for Regulators
Policymakers face the challenge of balancing tax revenue generation with maintaining competitive legal markets that achieve high channelization. The evidence from multiple jurisdictions provides clear guidance on effective policy design.
Tax rates should be set based on empirical evidence of channelization impacts rather than short-term revenue targets. The Netherlands’ experience demonstrates that excessive taxation can produce net revenue losses as players migrate to offshore platforms. The sustainable range appears to be 15-25% of GGR for most markets, with only exceptionally large and captive markets like New York able to sustain higher rates.
Competitive licensing frameworks consistently outperform monopoly models on every metric: channelization rates, tax revenue, consumer satisfaction, and innovation. Ontario’s 86% channelization versus 11% in monopoly provinces provides definitive evidence that competition works better than government-operated platforms.
- Mandate robust player protection technology as a licensing prerequisite rather than implementing it reactively after harm occurs
- Coordinate with international partners on enforcement mechanisms, particularly DNS blocking and payment infrastructure disruption
- Focus regulatory resources on meaningful harm reduction measures rather than administrative compliance burdens that make legal operators less competitive
- Use data-driven policy making to evaluate the actual impact of regulations on channelization and public health outcomes
Methodology
This research synthesizes publicly available regulatory documents, industry reports, government statistics, and media analysis covering the period from January 2024 to December 2025. Data sources include regulatory agency publications from the UK Gambling Commission, iGaming Ontario, various state gaming commissions, and telecommunications regulators including Brazil’s Anatel and Australia’s ACMA.
Financial and market data were obtained from public company filings, industry research firms including Eilers & Krejcik Gaming and Grand View Research, and specialized gambling industry publications. All statistics and claims were verified against primary sources where possible, with preference given to government publications, regulatory releases, and peer-reviewed research over secondary industry analysis.
Conclusions
The global sports betting industry has entered a new phase characterized by market maturation, regulatory sophistication, and an emphasis on sustainable profitability. The era of growth-at-all-costs has definitively ended, replaced by strategic focus on operational efficiency, compliance technology, and market selection.
Tax policy has emerged as the most critical determinant of market success. Excessive rates above 30% of GGR consistently produce counterproductive results, shrinking legal markets and reducing total tax revenue. The sustainable range of 15-25% balances operator viability with meaningful public revenue while maintaining competitive legal products that achieve high channelization.
The path forward requires collaboration between operators and regulators to create frameworks that protect consumers, generate sustainable tax revenue, and maintain competitive legal markets. The alternative—punitive taxation and restrictive regulation—consistently strengthens illegal offshore operations at the expense of both consumer protection and government revenue.
Success in this evolving landscape requires operators to accept that first-mover advantages and scale economies have created high barriers to entry in mature markets. New entrants face formidable challenges competing against established duopolies like FanDuel and DraftKings. The strategic opportunity lies in securing licenses in emerging open-licensing markets with moderate taxation before consolidation occurs.
Sources
This research was compiled from the following verified sources:
- ResearchAndMarkets.com (2025) – Sports Betting Market Analysis by Platform, Type, Betting Type, Sports, and Region – Global Size, Trends and Forecasts to 2030 – https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250701714574/en/$198.5-Bn-Sports-Betting-Market-Analysis-by-Platform-Type-Betting-Type-Sports-and-Region—Global-Size-Trends-and-Forecasts-to-2030—ResearchAndMarkets.com
- The Lines (2024) – Why FanDuel & DraftKings Dominate Sports Betting Market Share – https://www.thelines.com/fanduel-draftkings-betmgm-caesars-espnbet-fanatics-market-share-2024/
- iGaming Business (2025) – Netherlands faces €200m gambling tax black hole as hike backfires – https://igamingbusiness.com/legal-compliance/licensing/netherlands-faces-e200m-gambling-tax-black-hole-as-rate-rise-backfires/
- Tax Foundation (2025) – Sports Betting Tax Revenue: States, Sportsbooks, and Consumers – https://taxfoundation.org/research/all/state/sports-betting-tax-revenue/
- Casino.org (2025) – iGaming Ontario Market Report: $82.7 Billion in Wagers in FY24/25 – https://www.casino.org/news/ontario-82-billion-in-total-igaming-wagers-fy-24-25/
- Sports Betting Operator (2024) – Study highlights the benefits of liberal sports betting regulation – https://sportsbettingoperator.com/blog/study-highlights-the-benefits-of-liberal-sports-betting-regulation/
- UK Gambling Commission (2024) – New rules boosting safety and consumer choice – https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/news/article/new-rules-boosting-safety-and-consumer-choice
- Games Magazine Brasil (2025) – Anatel has already taken down more than 18,000 illegal betting sites in Brazil – https://www.gamesbras.com/english-version/2025/9/8/anatel-has-already-taken-down-more-than-18000-illegal-betting-sites-in-brazil-58251.html
- Grand View Research (2025) – Sports Betting Market Size & Share Industry Report, 2030 – https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/sports-betting-market-report
- CBS Sports (2025) – FanDuel vs. DraftKings: Which is the bigger sports betting giant? – https://www.cbssports.com/betting/news/fanduel-vs-draftkings-which-is-the-bigger-sports-betting-giant/
- NEXT.io (2024) – JMP: FanDuel consolidates GGR market share lead in Q1 2024 – https://next.io/news/betting/jmp-fanduel-consolidates-market-share-lead/
- Gaming in Holland (2024) – Dutch gambling tax rate to be increased to 34.2% from 2025, 37.8% from 2026 – https://www.gaminginholland.com/post/dutch-gambling-tax-rate-to-be-increased-to-34-2-from-2025-37-8-from-2026
- Sports Betting Dime (2024) – New York Reports $861 Million in 2023 Online Sports Betting Tax Revenue – https://www.sportsbettingdime.com/news/betting/new-york-gaming-commission-reports-861-million-in-2023-online-sports-betting-tax-revenue/
- Spectrum News (2023) – New York sportsbooks urge lower mobile betting tax rate – https://spectrumlocalnews.com/nys/capital-region/politics/2023/01/31/sportsbooks-urge-lower-mobile-betting-tax-rate
- UK Government – General Betting Duty, Pool Betting Duty and Remote Gaming Duty – https://www.gov.uk/guidance/general-betting-duty-pool-betting-duty-and-remote-gaming-duty
- Canadian Gaming Business (2025) – Ontario Online Gambling Marks Third Anniversary Of Regulation – https://www.canadiangamingbusiness.com/2025/04/04/ontario-online-gambling-market-third-birthday/
- SBC News (2025) – UKGC says 97% of financial checks completed frictionlessly – https://sbcnews.co.uk/sportsbook/2025/07/07/ukgc-frictionless-checks/
- iGaming Express (2025) – What Changed in Gambling Regulation Globally in the First Months of 2025 – https://igamingexpress.com/what-changed-in-gambling-regulation-globally-in-the-first-months-of-2025/
- Yogonet International (2025) – Brazil intensifies fight against illegal betting with site takedowns and financial oversight – https://www.yogonet.com/international/news/2025/09/09/115245-brazil-intensifies-fight-against-illegal-betting-with-site-takedowns-and-financial-oversight
