Regulators — GDR Ratings

257 rated regulators.

Tier
Reset

257 matches.

CompareNameFitRegulatory Effectiveness ScoreStakeholder Accessibility ScoreOverallTier
UK Gambling Commission
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 9.3; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 9.2
93%9.39.29.3/10Strong
Nevada Gaming Control Board
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 9.2; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 9.0
91%9.29.09.1/10Strong
Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 8.8; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 8.9
89%8.88.98.9/10Strong
Hong Kong Jockey Club
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 9.2; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 8.0
86%9.28.08.6/10Strong
Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA)
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 8.4; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 8.6
85%8.48.68.5/10Strong
Virginia Lottery
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 8.4; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 8.6
85%8.48.68.5/10Strong
Ohio Casino Control Commission
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 8.2; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 8.5
84%8.28.58.4/10Strong
Michigan Gaming Control Board
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 8.2; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 8.5
84%8.28.58.4/10Strong
Spelinspektionen
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 8.3; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 8.5
84%8.38.58.4/10Strong
Indiana Gaming Commission
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 8.2; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 8.5
84%8.28.58.3/10Strong
Spillemyndigheden
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 8.2; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 8.5
84%8.28.58.3/10Strong
Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (AGCO)
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 8.2; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 7.9
81%8.27.98.1/10Strong
Wyoming Gaming Commission
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 7.8; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 8.2
80%7.88.28.0/10Strong
Kansspelautoriteit (KSA)
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 8.3; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 7.4
79%8.37.47.9/10Moderate
Massachusetts Gaming Commission
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 7.2; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 8.4
78%7.28.47.8/10Moderate
Illinois Gaming Board
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 8.1; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 7.4
78%8.17.47.8/10Moderate
Gibraltar Gambling Commissioner
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 8.3; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 7.3
78%8.37.37.8/10Moderate
New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 8.1; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 7.3
77%8.17.37.7/10Moderate
Minnesota Gambling Control Board
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 7.8; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 7.5
77%7.87.57.7/10Moderate
Swiss Federal Gaming Board (ESBK)
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 8.3; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 7.1
77%8.37.17.7/10Moderate
Malta Gaming Authority
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 7.1; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 8.3
77%7.18.37.7/10Moderate
Autorité Nationale des Jeux
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 8.2; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 7.1
77%8.27.17.7/10Moderate
Maine Gambling Control Unit
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 7.4; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 7.8
76%7.47.87.6/10Moderate
Alberta Gaming, Liquor and Cannabis Commission
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 7.8; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 7.3
76%7.87.37.6/10Moderate
Serviço de Regulação e Inspeção de Jogos (SRIJ)
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 7.3; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 7.8
76%7.37.87.6/10Moderate
Gambling Supervision Commission of the Isle of Man
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 8.3; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 6.8
76%8.36.87.6/10Moderate
Alderney Gambling Control Commission
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 8.3; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 6.8
76%8.36.87.6/10Moderate
Washington State Gambling Commission
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 7.8; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 7.2
75%7.87.27.5/10Moderate
Oregon Lottery
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 7.8; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 7.2
75%7.87.27.5/10Moderate
North Carolina State Lottery Commission
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 7.2; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 7.7
75%7.27.77.5/10Moderate
Louisiana Gaming Control Board
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 7.8; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 7.1
75%7.87.17.5/10Moderate
National Indian Gaming Commission (NIGC)
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 7.6; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 7.3
75%7.67.37.5/10Moderate
Dirección General de Ordenación del Juego (DGOJ)
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 7.8; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 7.2
75%7.87.27.5/10Moderate
Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 7.3; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 7.6
75%7.37.67.4/10Moderate
South Dakota Commission on Gaming
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 7.2; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 7.5
74%7.27.57.4/10Moderate
Maryland Lottery and Gaming Control Agency
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 7.2; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 7.6
74%7.27.67.4/10Moderate
Casino Regulatory Authority (CRA)
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 7.3; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 7.5
74%7.37.57.4/10Moderate
Georgia Lottery Corporation
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 7.1; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 7.4
73%7.17.47.3/10Moderate
Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.9; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 7.6
73%6.97.67.2/10Moderate
New York State Gaming Commission
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 7.0; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 7.4
72%7.07.47.2/10Moderate
Kansas Racing and Gaming Commission
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 7.3; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 7.0
72%7.37.07.2/10Moderate
Arizona Department of Gaming
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 7.1; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 7.0
71%7.17.07.1/10Moderate
Gaming Inspection and Coordination Bureau (DICJ)
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 7.3; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 6.8
71%7.36.87.1/10Moderate
Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 7.6; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 6.5
71%7.66.57.1/10Moderate
Wisconsin Division of Gaming
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.8; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 7.2
70%6.87.27.0/10Moderate
West Virginia Lottery
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 7.1; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 6.8
70%7.16.87.0/10Moderate
District of Columbia Office of Lottery and Gaming
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.8; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 7.2
70%6.87.27.0/10Moderate
Tennessee Sports Wagering Council
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.8; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 7.2
70%6.87.27.0/10Moderate
Rhode Island Lottery
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 7.2; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 6.8
70%7.26.87.0/10Moderate
North Dakota Office of Attorney General
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.8; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 7.2
70%6.87.27.0/10Moderate
New Mexico Gaming Control Board
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.8; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 7.2
70%6.87.27.0/10Moderate
Nebraska Racing and Gaming Commission
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.8; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 7.2
70%6.87.27.0/10Moderate
Missouri Gaming Commission
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.8; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 7.2
70%6.87.27.0/10Moderate
Idaho State Lottery
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.8; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 7.2
70%6.87.27.0/10Moderate
General Directorate of Gaming and Raffles (DGAJS)
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 7.4; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 6.6
70%7.46.67.0/10Moderate
South Australia Consumer and Business Services
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.8; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 7.0
69%6.87.06.9/10Moderate
Casino Regulatory Commission of Japan
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.5; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 7.2
69%6.57.26.8/10Moderate
Mauritius Gambling Regulatory Authority
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.5; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 7.2
69%6.57.26.8/10Moderate
Atlantic Lottery Corporation (ALC)
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 7.0; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 6.6
68%7.06.66.8/10Moderate
Provincial Gambling Boards (9 Provinces)
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.4; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 7.1
68%6.47.16.8/10Moderate
Queensland Office of Liquor and Gaming Regulation
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.8; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 6.6
67%6.86.66.7/10Moderate
Oklahoma Horse Racing Commission
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.8; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 6.5
67%6.86.56.7/10Moderate
Panama Gaming Control Board
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.3; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 7.1
67%6.37.16.7/10Moderate
KRAIL of Ukraine
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.3; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 7.1
67%6.37.16.7/10Moderate
Western Australia Department of Local Government, Sport and Cultural Industries
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.8; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 6.3
66%6.86.36.6/10Moderate
Tasmanian Liquor and Gaming Commission
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.8; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 6.3
66%6.86.36.6/10Moderate
NSW Gaming Authority
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.2; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 6.9
66%6.26.96.6/10Moderate
New Hampshire Lottery
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.4; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 6.8
66%6.46.86.6/10Moderate
Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation (OLG)
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.8; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 6.4
66%6.86.46.6/10Moderate
Hellenic Gaming Commission
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.3; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 6.8
66%6.36.86.6/10Moderate
South Carolina Education Lottery
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.8; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 6.2
65%6.86.26.5/10Moderate
Montana Lottery
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.2; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 6.8
65%6.26.86.5/10Moderate
Florida Division of Pari‑Mutuel Wagering
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.7; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 6.2
65%6.76.26.5/10Moderate
Colorado Division of Gaming
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.8; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 6.2
65%6.86.26.5/10Moderate
Vermont Department of Liquor and Lottery
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.1; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 6.7
64%6.16.76.4/10Moderate
Financial Administration of Slovenia
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.5; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 6.2
64%6.56.26.4/10Moderate
Estonian Tax and Customs Board (EMTA)
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.8
64%6.85.96.4/10Moderate
Gaming Regulatory Commission of El Salvador
Stakeholder Accessibility Score 6.9
64%5.86.96.3/10Moderate
ONJN
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.1; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 6.6
64%6.16.66.3/10Moderate
ACT Gambling and Racing Commission
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.4; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 6.1
63%6.46.16.3/10Moderate
Mississippi Gaming Commission
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.2; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 6.3
63%6.26.36.3/10Moderate
Kentucky Horse Racing and Gaming Corporation
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.6
63%6.65.96.3/10Moderate
Ministry of Foreign Trade and Tourism (Mincetur)
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.6
63%6.65.96.3/10Moderate
California Gambling Control Commission
Stakeholder Accessibility Score 6.8
62%5.66.86.2/10Moderate
BC Lottery Corporation (BCLC)
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.3; Stakeholder Accessibility Score 6.0
62%6.36.06.2/10Moderate
National Lotteries and Gaming Regulatory Board of Uganda
Stakeholder Accessibility Score 6.5
62%5.86.56.1/10Moderate
Texas Racing Commission
Stakeholder Accessibility Score 6.4
61%5.86.46.1/10Moderate
Jersey Gambling Commission
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 7.3
61%7.34.96.1/10Moderate
Glücksspielbehörde der Länder (GGL)
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.7
61%6.75.46.1/10Moderate
Gaming Policy and Enforcement Branch of British Columbia
Stakeholder Accessibility Score 6.5
60%5.56.56.0/10Moderate
Games of Chance Administration of Serbia
Stakeholder Accessibility Score 6.2
60%5.86.26.0/10Moderate
Bhutan Gaming Authority
Stakeholder Accessibility Score 6.8
60%5.16.85.9/10Moderate
Loterias do Estado do Paraná (Lottopar)
no sub-score above 6
59%5.85.95.9/10Moderate
Delaware Lottery
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.1
59%6.15.65.9/10Moderate
Gaming Commission of Ghana
Stakeholder Accessibility Score 6.5
59%5.36.55.9/10Moderate
Kahnawake Gaming Commission
no sub-score above 6
58%5.95.75.8/10Moderate
Ministry of Finance of Slovakia
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.1
58%6.15.55.8/10Moderate
Liquor, Gaming and Cannabis Authority of Manitoba (LGCA)
no sub-score above 6
58%5.65.95.8/10Moderate
Saskatchewan Liquor and Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
57%5.85.55.7/10Moderate
Aruba Gaming Control Board
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.3
57%6.35.15.7/10Moderate
Senegal Gaming Authority
Stakeholder Accessibility Score 6.1
57%5.36.15.7/10Moderate
State Commission on Gambling of Bulgaria
no sub-score above 6
57%5.65.85.7/10Moderate
Arkansas Racing Commission
no sub-score above 6
56%5.85.45.6/10Moderate
Uruguayan Ministry of Economy and Finance
no sub-score above 6
56%5.85.35.6/10Moderate
Szerencsejáték Felügyelet (SZTFH)
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.3
56%6.34.85.6/10Moderate
Betting Control and Licensing Board of Kenya
Stakeholder Accessibility Score 6.2
55%4.86.25.5/10Moderate
Ministerstvo Financí of the Czech Republic
no sub-score above 6
55%5.85.25.5/10Moderate
Betting, Gaming and Lotteries Commission of Jamaica
no sub-score above 6
54%4.85.95.4/10Moderate
Morocco Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
54%5.84.95.4/10Moderate
Norwegian Gaming Authority
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.5
54%6.54.25.4/10Moderate
Monaco Casino Authority
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 7.5
54%7.53.25.4/10Moderate
Gaming Control Authority of Lithuania
Regulatory Effectiveness Score 6.9
54%6.93.95.4/10Moderate
Armenian Gambling Regulatory Commission
no sub-score above 6
53%4.95.75.2/10Moderate
Labuan Financial Services Authority (Labuan FSA)
Stakeholder Accessibility Score 6.1
52%4.26.15.2/10Moderate
Virgin Islands Lottery
no sub-score above 6
51%4.85.45.1/10Moderate
Puerto Rico Gaming Commission
no sub-score above 6
50%4.75.25.0/10Moderate
LOTEP
no sub-score above 6
50%4.85.25.0/10Moderate
Curaçao Gaming Authority (CGA)
no sub-score above 6
50%4.25.85.0/10Moderate
Superintendence of Casinos of Games (SCJ)
no sub-score above 6
50%4.85.25.0/10Moderate
Regional State Administrative Agency of Finland
no sub-score above 6
50%4.15.84.9/10Poor
Lagos State Lotteries and Gaming Authority (LSLGA)
no sub-score above 6
49%4.75.14.9/10Poor
Lotería de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires (LOTBA)
no sub-score above 6
48%5.24.44.8/10Poor
Secretariat of Prizes and Bets (SPA)
no sub-score above 6
47%5.14.24.7/10Poor
Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corporation (PAGCOR)
no sub-score above 6
47%4.25.14.7/10Poor
Kyrgyzstan Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
47%4.25.14.7/10Poor
National Lottery Regulatory Commission (NLRC)
no sub-score above 6
47%4.25.14.7/10Poor
Cameroon Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
47%4.25.14.7/10Poor
Autoridad de Fiscalización del Juego (AJ)
no sub-score above 6
45%4.24.84.5/10Poor
Directorate of Casinos and Gambling (DCJA)
no sub-score above 6
45%4.24.84.5/10Poor
Mongolia Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
45%4.24.84.5/10Poor
Nagaland Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
45%4.24.84.5/10Poor
Zimbabwe Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
45%4.24.84.5/10Poor
Botswana Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
45%4.74.24.5/10Poor
Belgian Gaming Commission
no sub-score above 6
45%4.84.24.5/10Poor
Mendoza Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
45%4.14.84.4/10Poor
Sri Lanka Gaming Board
no sub-score above 6
45%4.14.84.4/10Poor
National Indian Gaming Commission of Canada
no sub-score above 6
44%4.14.64.4/10Poor
Commission des Jeux de Hasard
no sub-score above 6
44%3.65.14.4/10Poor
Lotteries and Gambling Supervisory Inspection of Latvia
no sub-score above 6
44%4.83.94.4/10Poor
IPLyC of Provincia de Buenos Aires
no sub-score above 6
44%4.14.64.4/10Poor
Conajzar
no sub-score above 6
43%4.73.84.3/10Poor
Nevis Online Gaming Authority (NOGA)
no sub-score above 6
43%4.14.54.3/10Poor
Dominica Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
43%4.14.54.3/10Poor
Northern Territory Racing Commission
no sub-score above 6
40%3.44.64.0/10Poor
Córdoba Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
40%4.23.84.0/10Poor
Grenada Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
40%3.84.24.0/10Poor
Bahamas Gaming Board
no sub-score above 6
40%4.23.84.0/10Poor
Korea Lottery Commission
no sub-score above 6
40%4.23.84.0/10Poor
Ministry of Taxes of Azerbaijan
no sub-score above 6
40%3.84.24.0/10Poor
Lotteries and Betting Control Board of Zambia
no sub-score above 6
40%4.23.84.0/10Poor
Namibia Gaming Control Board
no sub-score above 6
40%4.23.84.0/10Poor
Eswatini Gaming Board
no sub-score above 6
40%4.23.84.0/10Poor
Cape Verde Gaming Board
no sub-score above 6
40%4.23.84.0/10Poor
Burkina Faso Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
40%4.23.84.0/10Poor
Gambling Regulatory Authority of Ireland (GRAI)
no sub-score above 6
40%4.23.84.0/10Poor
Cyprus National Betting Authority
no sub-score above 6
40%4.23.84.0/10Poor
Nepal Government Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
40%4.13.83.9/10Poor
Federal Ministry of Finance of Austria
no sub-score above 6
39%4.23.53.9/10Poor
Maranhão Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
38%3.63.93.8/10Poor
Commonwealth Casino Commission
no sub-score above 6
38%3.54.03.8/10Poor
Financial Services Regulatory Commission (FSRC)
no sub-score above 6
38%3.44.13.8/10Poor
Uzbekistan Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
38%4.13.53.8/10Poor
Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism of South Korea
no sub-score above 6
37%4.13.33.7/10Poor
Gaming Board of Tanzania
no sub-score above 6
37%4.23.13.7/10Poor
ARJH of Côte d’Ivoire
no sub-score above 6
37%4.23.13.7/10Poor
San Marino Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
37%4.23.13.7/10Poor
Alaska Department of Revenue
no sub-score above 6
36%3.14.03.4/10Poor
Nicaraguan Institute of Tourism
no sub-score above 6
35%2.94.13.5/10Poor
Belize Gaming Control Board
no sub-score above 6
35%3.83.23.5/10Poor
Ministry of Tourism of Timor-Leste
no sub-score above 6
35%3.13.93.5/10Poor
Indonesian Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
35%4.22.83.5/10Poor
Ministry of Finance of Guatemala
no sub-score above 6
35%3.83.23.5/10Poor
Niger Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
35%3.83.23.5/10Poor
Malawi Gaming Board
no sub-score above 6
35%3.83.23.5/10Poor
Administration for Games of Chance of Montenegro
no sub-score above 6
35%4.22.83.5/10Poor
Revenue Service of Georgia
no sub-score above 6
35%3.73.23.5/10Poor
Gaming Control Board Suriname (GCBS)
no sub-score above 6
34%3.82.93.4/10Poor
Misiones Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
34%4.12.63.4/10Poor
Ministry of Planning and Investment of Laos
no sub-score above 6
34%2.93.83.4/10Poor
Rwanda Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
34%3.82.93.4/10Poor
Benin Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
34%3.82.93.4/10Poor
Salta Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
33%2.93.73.3/10Poor
Ministry of Finance of Honduras
no sub-score above 6
33%3.43.13.3/10Poor
Ministry of Finance of Poland
no sub-score above 6
33%4.12.53.3/10Poor
Veikkaus Oy
no sub-score above 6
33%3.43.13.3/10Poor
Gambia Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
31%3.42.83.1/10Poor
DRC Gaming Commission
no sub-score above 6
31%3.42.83.1/10Poor
Games of Chance Directorate of North Macedonia
no sub-score above 6
31%3.32.83.1/10Poor
Consell Regulador Andorrà del Joc
no sub-score above 6
31%3.32.93.1/10Poor
Ministry of Finance of Vietnam
no sub-score above 6
30%3.22.83.0/10Poor
Government Lottery Office (GLO)
no sub-score above 6
30%3.32.73.0/10Poor
Tax Administration of Croatia
no sub-score above 6
30%3.22.83.0/10Poor
Spor Toto Teşkilat Başkanlığı
no sub-score above 6
30%3.22.83.0/10Poor
Rio de Janeiro Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
30%3.12.83.0/10Prohibitive
Ministry of Economy, Industry and Commerce (MEIC)
no sub-score above 6
30%2.13.82.9/10Prohibitive
Taiwan Sports Administration
no sub-score above 6
30%2.13.82.9/10Prohibitive
Ministry of Tourism of Egypt
no sub-score above 6
29%3.12.72.9/10Prohibitive
Gaming and Betting Board of Trinidad and Tobago
no sub-score above 6
28%3.22.42.8/10Prohibitive
São Tomé and Príncipe Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
28%3.12.42.8/10Prohibitive
Lesotho Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
28%3.42.12.8/10Prohibitive
Ministry of Finance of Iceland
no sub-score above 6
28%2.13.42.8/10Prohibitive
Ministry of Taxes and Duties of Belarus
no sub-score above 6
28%3.12.52.8/10Prohibitive
Nepal Government Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
27%3.22.12.7/10Prohibitive
Goa State Government Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
27%3.22.12.7/10Prohibitive
Madagascar Gaming Board
no sub-score above 6
27%3.22.12.7/10Prohibitive
Angola Gaming Institute
no sub-score above 6
27%3.22.12.7/10Prohibitive
Milli Piyango İdaresi
no sub-score above 6
27%3.22.12.7/10Prohibitive
Kazakhstan Gaming Zones Regulatory Authority
no sub-score above 6
25%2.82.12.5/10Prohibitive
Ministry of Economy and Finance of Cambodia
no sub-score above 6
25%2.82.12.5/10Prohibitive
National Lottery Services of Ethiopia
no sub-score above 6
25%3.21.82.5/10Prohibitive
Gaming Supervision Commission of Bosnia and Herzegovina
no sub-score above 6
25%2.92.12.5/10Prohibitive
Gaming Authority of Guyana
no sub-score above 6
24%2.81.92.4/10Prohibitive
General Gaming Inspection of Mozambique
no sub-score above 6
24%2.81.92.4/10Prohibitive
Republic of Congo Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
24%2.81.92.4/10Prohibitive
Chad Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
24%2.81.92.4/10Prohibitive
National Commission of Casinos, Bingo Halls, and Slot Machines (CNC)
no sub-score above 6
22%2.91.52.2/10Prohibitive
Iranian Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
22%3.21.12.2/10Prohibitive
Barbados Gambling Licensing Authority
no sub-score above 6
21%1.92.32.1/10Prohibitive
Maldives Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
21%2.31.82.1/10Prohibitive
Sierra Leone Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
21%2.31.82.1/10Prohibitive
Liberia Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
20%2.11.82.0/10Prohibitive
Pakistan Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
18%2.11.41.8/10Prohibitive
Ministry of Finance of Malaysia
no sub-score above 6
18%2.11.41.8/10Prohibitive
Togo Gaming Commission
no sub-score above 6
18%2.11.41.8/10Prohibitive
Gabon Gaming Commission
no sub-score above 6
18%2.11.41.8/10Prohibitive
Sint Maarten Gaming Control Board
no sub-score above 6
17%1.91.41.7/10Prohibitive
Saint Lucia Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
17%2.21.11.7/10Prohibitive
Tajikistan Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
17%2.11.21.7/10Prohibitive
Sikkim Government Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
17%2.11.31.7/10Prohibitive
Brunei Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
17%2.11.21.7/10Prohibitive
Eritrea Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
17%2.31.11.7/10Prohibitive
National Lottery of Moldova
no sub-score above 6
17%2.11.31.7/10Prohibitive
Djibouti Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
15%1.81.21.6/10Prohibitive
Guam Gaming Commission
no sub-score above 6
15%1.41.61.5/10Prohibitive
Turkmenistan Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
15%2.10.91.5/10Prohibitive
Mali Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
15%1.71.31.5/10Prohibitive
Guinea-Bissau Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
15%1.81.21.5/10Prohibitive
Equatorial Guinea Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
15%1.81.21.5/10Prohibitive
Alabama Indian Affairs Commission
no sub-score above 6
15%0.82.11.5/10Prohibitive
Bangladesh Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
11%1.20.91.1/10Prohibitive
Central African Republic Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
11%1.20.91.1/10Prohibitive
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
10%1.20.71.0/10Prohibitive
Haiti Gaming Commission
no sub-score above 6
10%1.20.81.0/10Prohibitive
Union Government of Myanmar
no sub-score above 6
10%1.20.71.0/10Prohibitive
Iraqi Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
10%1.20.81.0/10Prohibitive
South Sudan Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
10%1.20.71.0/10Prohibitive
Algerian National Lottery Authority
no sub-score above 6
10%1.20.71.0/10Prohibitive
Guinea Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
9%1.10.60.9/10Prohibitive
Tunisian Gambling Commission
no sub-score above 6
4%0.00.70.4/10Prohibitive
Yemen Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
3%0.00.50.3/10Prohibitive
Somalia Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
3%0.00.50.3/10Prohibitive
Sudan Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
1%0.00.20.1/10Prohibitive
Libyan Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
1%0.00.20.1/10Prohibitive
Albanian Gambling Authority
no sub-score above 6
0%0.00.03.5/10Poor
American Samoa Government
no sub-score above 6
0%0.00.00.0/10Prohibitive
Cuban Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
0%0.00.00.0/10Prohibitive
Mauritania Gaming Authority
no sub-score above 6
0%0.00.00.0/10Prohibitive